The CONDOM "Revisionist" Forum
Don't read this if disgusting analogies or offensive language bothers you.
Why should the codoh "revisionist'' forum change it's name to 'condom'?
Easy question.
1) The name CODOH is misleading, as it stands for 'comitte for open debate on the Holocasust'. Aswe have already seen, the CODOH forum isn't for open debate. Opponents are routinely censored there. In fact, things are so tight there that Private Messages are not even allowed! How fucked up is that?
2)The forum is really very filthy and dirty, like a used condom. "Revisionist" filth is paraded around there. And worst of all, anyone who debunks it is censored.
But wait a second. Is my saying that the stuff in codoh is filth justified? Yes it is. Once when I went there, the "revisionists" there were trying the disprove the infamous photo of cremations in Birkenau.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1103
How did they do this? Hargis (one of the moderators there) zoomed up on the alleged photo which showed spaghetti-like corpses.
After a few seconds of looking at the photo with the spaghetti corpses, I immediately realized that the spaghetti corpses where faked. Try zooming up on the photo. I don't see anything strange when doing so. This is what I get whan I zoom up on the corpses:
it quickly becomes obvious that there are in reality no spaghetti-like corpses; this was just done by a fucked up "revisionist', apparently Udo Walendy, for his own ideological reason.
Thus once more proof that denial is based on pure faith.
So we see that, like a dirty and used condom, the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum is filthy and doesn't allow free speech. In reality, the majority of the ''revisionists'' at CODOH are morons and have no idea what free speech is.
From hereafter the author will refer to the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum as CONDOM, the truly appropiate name.
Why should the codoh "revisionist'' forum change it's name to 'condom'?
Easy question.
1) The name CODOH is misleading, as it stands for 'comitte for open debate on the Holocasust'. Aswe have already seen, the CODOH forum isn't for open debate. Opponents are routinely censored there. In fact, things are so tight there that Private Messages are not even allowed! How fucked up is that?
2)The forum is really very filthy and dirty, like a used condom. "Revisionist" filth is paraded around there. And worst of all, anyone who debunks it is censored.
But wait a second. Is my saying that the stuff in codoh is filth justified? Yes it is. Once when I went there, the "revisionists" there were trying the disprove the infamous photo of cremations in Birkenau.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1103
How did they do this? Hargis (one of the moderators there) zoomed up on the alleged photo which showed spaghetti-like corpses.
After a few seconds of looking at the photo with the spaghetti corpses, I immediately realized that the spaghetti corpses where faked. Try zooming up on the photo. I don't see anything strange when doing so. This is what I get whan I zoom up on the corpses:
it quickly becomes obvious that there are in reality no spaghetti-like corpses; this was just done by a fucked up "revisionist', apparently Udo Walendy, for his own ideological reason.
Thus once more proof that denial is based on pure faith.
So we see that, like a dirty and used condom, the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum is filthy and doesn't allow free speech. In reality, the majority of the ''revisionists'' at CODOH are morons and have no idea what free speech is.
From hereafter the author will refer to the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum as CONDOM, the truly appropiate name.
posted by 104839sobe104839 at 11:36 PM
5 comments
