An Unsurprising Case of Denial Silence...

Deniers are always claiming that there's no evidence for the Holocaust. Yeshhhhhhh, for sure, 'no evidence':

(From the verdict of an SS supreme Court in Munich, 1943, against SS-Untersturmfuehrer Max Tauebner, quoted in Klee, Dressen, Riess, The Good Old Days, p. 201):

The accused shall not be punished because of the actions against the Jews as such. The Jews have to be exterminated and none of the Jews that were killed is any great loss. Although the accused should have recognized that the extermination of the Jews was the duty of Kommandos which were set up especially for this purpose, he should be excused for considering himself to have the authority to take part in the extermination of Jewry himself. Real hatred of the Jews was the driving motivation for the accused.

Well, when I posted this at the RODOH Holocaust debate forum I received no response from the deniers there, other than notions that we must have the original document (LOL).

Why is this so? It seems we have a serious but understandable case of denier silence.




But then again, that's why it's called denial, not revisionism.