For rodochcodohwatchwatch

In one of my previous posts, I was examining a photo that was tampered and altered by "revisionist" reverend Udo Walendy. I zoomed up on the photo and stated thusly:

But wait a second. Is my saying that the stuff in codoh is filth justified? Yes it is. Once when I went there, the "revisionists" there were trying the disprove the infamous photo of cremations in Birkenau.

http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1103





















How did they do this? Hargis (one of the moderators there) zoomed up on the alleged photo which showed spaghetti-like corpses.





















After a few seconds of looking at the photo with the spaghetti corpses, I immediately realized that the spaghetti corpses where faked. Try zooming up on the photo. I don't see anything strange when doing so. This is what I get whan I zoom up on the corpses:











it quickly becomes obvious that there are in reality no spaghetti-like corpses; this was just done by a fucked up "revisionist', apparently Udo Walendy, for his own ideological reason.

Rodohcodohwatchwatch noted:

Your commentery would carry more weight if you had zoomed in on the same area of the photo that Udo had.

I then said:

Well, you can still see part of the same part of the photo were walendy zoomed in.

Rodohcodohwatchwatch then made a ridiiculous assumption:

Exactly, which makes me wonder why you did not try to exactly replicate Udo's work? My assumption is that when you did so the bodies looked rather spaghetti like - so you moved the field to the right.

Ok, I was nice enough to make a post specially for adressing this absurd notion. Just for Rodohcodohwatchwatch, I zoomed up on the part of the photo were Walendy also zoomed in:













BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The CONDOM "Revisionist" Forum

Don't read this if disgusting analogies or offensive language bothers you.


Why should the codoh "revisionist'' forum change it's name to 'condom'?

Easy question.

1) The name CODOH is misleading, as it stands for 'comitte for open debate on the Holocasust'. Aswe have already seen, the CODOH forum isn't for open debate. Opponents are routinely censored there. In fact, things are so tight there that Private Messages are not even allowed! How fucked up is that?

2)The forum is really very filthy and dirty, like a used condom. "Revisionist" filth is paraded around there. And worst of all, anyone who debunks it is censored.

But wait a second. Is my saying that the stuff in codoh is filth justified? Yes it is. Once when I went there, the "revisionists" there were trying the disprove the infamous photo of cremations in Birkenau.

http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=1103





















How did they do this? Hargis (one of the moderators there) zoomed up on the alleged photo which showed spaghetti-like corpses.





















After a few seconds of looking at the photo with the spaghetti corpses, I immediately realized that the spaghetti corpses where faked. Try zooming up on the photo. I don't see anything strange when doing so. This is what I get whan I zoom up on the corpses:











it quickly becomes obvious that there are in reality no spaghetti-like corpses; this was just done by a fucked up "revisionist', apparently Udo Walendy, for his own ideological reason.

Thus once more proof that denial is based on pure faith.

So we see that, like a dirty and used condom, the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum is filthy and doesn't allow free speech. In reality, the majority of the ''revisionists'' at CODOH are morons and have no idea what free speech is.

From hereafter the author will refer to the CODOH ''revisionist'' forum as CONDOM, the truly appropiate name.

Dresden

I love it when deniers argue that the Dresden death toll is in ther hundreds of thousands.

As I am a member of the RODOH Holocaust discussion forum, I see a lot of emotional but not logistical whining from Wilfried Heink, known there as 'neugriegig' about the bombing of Dresden, since he was there to witness it and has Nazi sympathies.

But anyway, let's just glance over this topic.

Ernst Zundel claimed that (see http://www.revisionism.nl/Dresden/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm)

"It is estimated by some that as many as 350,000 - 600,000 victims were incinerated beyond being identifiable or even recognizable as human remains in that Holocaust."

Okay, first of all, the number of victims 'incinerated beyond being identifiable' is ridiculous. There is absolutely no evidence to support this claim. Second of all, at the temperatures reached at Dresden (as high as 1600 Farenheit), a victim cannot be turned into particles so small that they cannot be identifiable.

The ridiculous death tolls are based on the forged version of the tB 47 report. F-O-R-G-E-D. The UNFORGED version of the report coincides with the reasonable death toll which is roughly 25,000-35,000 dead.

Many deniers knowingly use the forged version of the TB 47 report.

Also, it is possible, using "revisionist' methods, to disprove the Allied bombing of Dresden. I read on a ''revisionist' website that bombers destroyed anything that moved. How then, did people manage to survive? Also, if the bombings where allegedly so severe that it created a firestorm, how come so many survived? The numbers vary so much!

It is obvious that the bombing of Dresden is a despicable hoax.


Just joking. :-)

More on this later.

Holocaust Denial Movie Debunked

For wome time now, Holocaust denier Denierbud has had his Holocaust Denial Movie watched over and over by evidently gullible and blindfolded sheeple. Angered by this blasphemy and lies, I made refutation vids. Here are the onces I have so far:

Clip No. 4: Engine Exhaust



Clip No. 8: Eliyahu Rosenberg



Clip No. 22: A Doctor Testifies



Clip No. 2: Water Well



Clip No. 3: Haircut



Clip No. 13: Sobibor Burial Space



Clip No. 11: Treblinka Burial Space